(Courtesy of Shakespeares sister)
breast feeding-woah there!! that's not what breasts are for! They're only sexual objects for me to ogle at!! Disgusting...
Boobophobes (via Chris Howard):
"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine.”
…“I immediately turned the magazine face down.”
…“Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob.”
…“I shredded it. A breast is a breast — it's a sexual thing. [My 13-yeard-old son] didn't need to see that."
Those are just some of the reactions to Babytalk’s recent cover, which “incited more than 700 letters to the editor, a record for the magazine.” A quarter of their 4,000 readers polled found the image “inappropriate.”
O.K..it is in America, but you can SO imagine that happening in the UK. Breasts are for one thing, and one thing only-to grace the cover of Nuts.
http://random-veryrandom.blog.co.uk
2006-07-31 @ 15:42